TOP LATEST FIVE CASE LAWS FOR THE BAIL OF SECTION 506 PPC URBAN NEWS

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news

Blog Article

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case legislation at both the federal and state levels.

Case law is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. By way of example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.

Unfortunately, that wasn't accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son advised his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the couple’s son several times.

Although there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be regarded from the court.

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A just isn't obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more

However it's made distinct that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject to law. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also be certain regard with the family lose in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security in the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be accomplished. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated previously mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that although taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the benefit of every one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of eligible candidates who are found to be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored via the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of the respondent department.

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions tend to be the opinions that are filed to the day that the appellate court issues its decision and tend to be not the court's final opinion.

Any court may well seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, click here to succeed in a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

Report this page